PD35-09 SINGLE PORT ROBOTIC UPPER URINARY TRACT RECONSTRUCTION – RESULTS FROM A SINGLE CENTER CASE SERIES

You have accessJournal of UrologyTrauma/Reconstruction/Diversion: Ureter (including Pyeloplasty) and Bladder Reconstruction fistula), Augmentation, Substitution, Diversion I (PD35)1 Sep 2021PD35-09 SINGLE PORT ROBOTIC UPPER URINARY TRACT RECONSTRUCTION – RESULTS FROM A CENTER CASE SERIES Graham Hale, Luca Morgantini, Simone Crivellaro HaleGraham Hale More articles by this author , MorgantiniLuca Morgantini CrivellaroSimone View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002039.09AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: the upper urinary tract can be challenging complex. The introduction minimally invasive surgical techniques has helped decrease morbidity these procedures. This case series seeks assess safety feasibility, report initial outcomes a single port robotic platform (SP) for reconstruction (RUT). METHODS: Between February 2019 March 2021, data were collected retrospectively on all cases SP RUT key outcome including patient demographic, pre, peri, post-operative data. RESULTS: 36 surgeries 31 patients performed (Table 1) with mean follow up 204 days. 8 procedures salvage previous RUT. Intra perioperative are summarized in Table 2. Average length stay was 2.11 days, 5/36 (14%) same day discharges 12/36 (33%) POD1.1 lost follow-up.24/30 (80%) stent symptoms free. 2 awaiting removal. One intraoperative complication (1/36, 2.8%) recorded (repaired sigmoid laceration : no additional intervention) (2/36, 5.6%) had urine leaks necessitating PCNs perioperatively. 6/35 (17.1%) failed required reoperation: received ureteroplasty (with success), chose dependent, nephrectomies atrophic kidney, poor renal function prior scan. results 3. CONCLUSIONS: Single is safe feasible. functional our short term period encouraging. Comparison studies other robotics platforms ongoing role reconstruction. Source Funding: None © 2021 American Urological Association Education Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e592-e593 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Expand Loading ...